Hospital Staffing Cuts – Pragmatic, Panic or Carefully Planned?

  • Author: Health Informer
  • Filed under: Health News
  • Date: May 2,2009

As the world sits on the brink of a pandemic flu outbreak, Minnesota’s hospitals are attempting to reduce the ranks of personnel most skilled to address emergency health needs.

Minnesota Nurses Association, the union representing more than 20,000 Registered Nurses in 89 bargaining units across the state, has received demands from nine hospitals to reopen contracts regarding wages. In the metro area, more than 100 MNA members have been laid off from their jobs since December 2008. The economic situation sounds dire as employers raise concerns about rising uncompensated care, proposed state budget cuts and dips in census and investments.

“We’re not buying it,” said MNA President Linda Slattengren. “Yes, we are pushing back at a time when our family and friends have all suffered from layoffs in this economic downturn. Yes, we are saying no to these demands from our employers.”

Why? Call nurses cautious – skeptics perhaps. As 24/7 bedside providers, nurses know patient census fluctuates, sometimes wildly, as in the case of a pandemic. The hospital industry has not proven their case to MNA members, who express doubts because hospital administrative judgment has proven to be, all too often, less than stellar when it comes to the safety of patients in our care.

“North Memorial Hospital, where I work, enjoyed a nearly $179 million net profit over the last six years,” said Pam Scott, RN. “But due to decisions like purchasing NowCare for $3 million in 2008 and reporting a $4 million loss in the latest financial statement, we have our doubts about the wisdom of administrative choices. My question: Isn’t the purpose of reserves to accommodate more unexpected circumstances, such as economic pressures?”

The medical arms race is alive and well in Minnesota, as hospitals have rushed to compete with each other by providing the latest gadgetry or architecturally-inspired surroundings. “They’ve projected at least $300 million in construction costs for the next three years at Children’s Hospitals and Clinics,” said Melissa Hansing, RN, MNA Tri-Chair and staff nurse in Children’s emergency department. “My questions: Bricks and mortar may impress financiers, but what is going on behind the walls? Aren’t critically ill patients being attended to by overworked, fatigued nursing personnel who simply do not have enough colleagues on each shift? How do you justify cutting corners on skilled personnel at the bedside, when studies conclusively prove the increased risk to patients when staffing is not adequate?”

The claim that patient volume is down conceals the fact that nurses are working with a much sicker, more complex patient population. The Medicare Case-Mix Index (MCI) reflects the increased intensity (sometimes called severity) or hospital resource requirements of treating Medicare patients over time. Methodist Hospital’s recent financial disclosure, available at munifilings.com, reveals the disturbing evidence. “In the last quarter, Methodist Hospital saw their MCI increase 5.3% over 2007′s 4th quarter,” said Margaret Gamble, RN. “My question: how do hospital accountants expect nurses to speed up healing time?”

Hospital schemes to wring wage concessions out of its workforce falsely depict an image that administrators are simply starting to ask for communal sacrifice. “When we all pitch in, we’ll make things better,” they claim. Nurses have been pitching in for quite a while now.

“I’ve already reduced my salary by 3% because I’ve agreed to reduce my workdays – without pay – when patient volume was low in the past 3 months,” said Juli Uzlik, RN of Fairview Southdale. The unspoken practice of nurses working off the clock over meal breaks or after they punch out also effectively donates time to the hospital bottom line. Ms. Uzlik went on to say, “Four of my colleagues have opted for early retirement. Over the last 90 days, Registered Nurses have agreed to a minimum value of $126,700 in salary hours. This doesn’t even account for mandatory low need days we’ve all taken, and other casual requests we’ve honored to work a shift here and there. Our question: what cuts in salary have the administrative staffs taken recently?”

On every shift, nurses witness waste and misuse of resources. “We have offered cost-saving suggestions time and time again, but it is the consultants who invariably capture the ear of decision-makers,” said Ms. Slattengren. “My question: When will they learn?”

Using the economic crisis as an excuse to reduce labor costs of the hospital’s core assets is a short-term temptation that will lead to higher costs and compromised care. The members of MNA challenge hospital executives throughout Minnesota to use clear-eyed, far-sighted courage to keep the interests of patients above the profit margin.

Uniting nurses in vision and voice since 1905. With 20,000 members, MNA is the leading organization for registered nurses in the Midwest and is among the oldest and largest representatives of RNs for collective bargaining in the nation. MNA is a multi-purpose union that fosters high standards for nursing education and practice, and works to advance the profession through legislative activity. MNA is affiliated with the United American Nurses and the Minnesota AFL-CIO.

Source: Minnesota Nurses Association


Markle Connecting for Health announces broad agreement on principles for Getting Health IT Right under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

Markle Foundation hosts a forum to discuss the $19 billion allocated to investments in health information technology (IT) under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Leaders in health care and information technology will meet with government and policy experts to talk about how these health IT investments can be directed toward improving health care outcomes, protecting patient privacy, and reducing growth in health care costs, laying the groundwork for health reform.

Markle Connecting for Health released key principles, supported by a diverse group of health and technology leaders, outlining an initial approach to getting health IT right under ARRA.

“The leaders present here will be instrumental in achieving the goals of ARRA and in making sure that these investments support broader health reform efforts,” said Zoe Baird, President of the Markle Foundation.

The event announces the release by Markle Connecting for Health of a new document entitled Achieving the Health Objectives Under ARRA: A Framework for “Meaningful Use” and “Certified or Qualified” EHR. The definition of meaningful use will determine how clinicians and hospitals qualify for the health IT incentives included in the economic stimulus law. The document is available for download at www.connectingforhealth.org.

The document was developed with the collaboration of a diverse group of consumer, business, and health organizations. Individuals supporting the document come from a wide array of organizations, including:

AARP — Allscripts — American Academy of Family Physicians — America’s Health Insurance Plans — Center for Democracy and Technology — Center for Information Therapy — Childbirth Connection — Chilmark Research — Consumers Union — Dossia — DrFirst — Google — Health Care For All — Intel Corporation — The Joint Commission — Keas, Inc. — McKesson Provider Technologies — Medical Group Management Association — Mental Health America — Microsoft Corporation — National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship — National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) — National Consumers League — National Partnership for Women & Families — NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and NewYork-Presbyterian Healthcare System — ReachMyDoctor — Surescripts — WebMD Health

“The consensus that we’ve been able to build – and continue to build – around the principles in this paper is truly remarkable,” said Baird. “There is enormous potential to improve our health care system through modern information tools. To do that, we need to set clear goals, define meaningful use as the use of information to improve health, and adopt an approach to technology and standards that fosters market innovation.”

The group advises practical starting points for using information to achieve the goals of ARRA. It says a basic set of open standards are necessary, along with assurances that systems bought with federal support are being used to achieve health improvement goals. The group recommends an approach to technology that encourages innovation of tools and services particularly for clinicians in small office practices.

“Meaningful use is not about technology for the sake of technology,” said Carol Diamond, MD, MPH, Managing Director at the Markle Foundation and Chair of the Markle Connecting for Health Initiative. “It’s about using that technology to improve health. We must invest this money in ways that support information use to improve quality, slow growth in costs and protect privacy, without creating undue burden on clinicians and practices.”

Source: The Markle Foundation


Do Fad Diets Really Work?

Leading Penn State Registered Dietitian Kris Clark, Ph.D., R.D., F.A.C.S.M., Clarifies This Year’s Popular Diet Myths and Offers Help for Women to Get on Track for Spring/Summer

Spring. It’s the time of year when we shed our unhealthy winter habits and renew the weight-loss vows we made back in January in hopes of seeing the numbers on the scale drop. Each year, millions of Americans follow the latest and greatest diet trends and widely publicized information in our quest to lose weight and manage our diets. However, many of the most common diet “truths” are false.

“Many women search for the magic bullet to shed extra pounds, but a lot of the most publicized diet trends result in false hope and even potential weight gain,” explains registered dietitian Kris Clark, Ph.D., R.D., F.A.C.S.M., Director of Sports Nutrition, The Pennsylvania State University. “Diet myths mislead and deceive women to believe a particular ingredient or diet plan will help them lose weight, when most of these are in fact incorrect and some can even be unhealthy.”

A recent national survey(1) finds that more than half of women are currently on or plan to be on a diet within the next one to two months and that 96% of these women fall victim to believing at least one of the most popular and prevalent diet myths.

Dr. Clark reveals a few of the popular diet myths to help women become more diet savvy:

  • Eating at night makes you gain weight. While a full belly might not make for the most restful night of sleep, our bodies don’t metabolize food differently in the evening than at other times of the day. Weight gain has nothing to do with when we eat, but rather what we eat and how much.
  • Avoid high fructose corn syrup to lose weight faster. Recent scientific reviews(2) confirm there is no unique link between high fructose corn syrup and obesity. In fact, high fructose corn syrup is nutritionally the same as sugar, metabolizes in the body similarly and is equally sweet with the same number of calories — only 4 per gram, compared to 9 calories per gram for fats. Dr. Clark adds, “No single food or ingredient is the cause of obesity or weight gain. Eating too many calories and getting too little exercise causes it.”
  • Detox from specific ingredients/food for quick, healthy weight loss. There is no scientific evidence that points to detox dieting being an effective weight loss strategy. Experts agree that moderation is the key to a healthy diet, whereas extreme measures, such as food restriction and fasting, may do more harm than good.
  • High protein, low carb diets are best for weight loss. A recent Harvard study(3) shows that regardless of protein or carb levels in the diet, total calories count when it comes to weight loss. The research pointed to low-fat and low-carb diets as being nearly identical.
  • Acai berry is the best new food for losing weight. This so-called “superfood” has recently received tremendous press that promises rapid and dramatic weight loss, but the truth is it has only been proven to be a healthy antioxidant.

More Than Nine in Ten Women Believe at Least Some of the Hype

When asked to identify which diet statements were true, a national survey of 516 women found that 96% of women were unable to correctly identify at least one of the more popular diet strategies as myth. Most women (83%) falsely believed the time of day impacts weight gain and 59% believed certain foods burn more calories during digestion than they contain. Some 53% of the women also incorrectly pointed to high protein, low carb diets as best for weight loss. In addition, 40% erroneously believed it is necessary to eliminate sugar, such as table sugar, honey and high fructose corn syrup to lose weight.

“Myths continue to gain momentum because they appeal to our desire to create shortcuts and make what requires hard work easy,” explains Dr. Clark. “But, the real culprit of weight gain is eating too many calories and getting too little exercise on a daily basis.”

How to Spot a Diet Myth

To demystify diet fact from fiction, Dr. Clark offers the following advice:

  • Do your homework. Just because you find a lot of information about a specific diet topic doesn’t mean the information is correct. Quality should always trump quantity when it comes to diet data, so check your references and ask a few key questions – is the information from a credible source or reputable health expert/organization, is the information current and is there scientific proof that it’s effective?
  • If it sounds too good to be true, it’s probably false. If you can only find glowing testimonials and positive remarks about a specific diet plan, then it’s likely a misleading promotion. Any legitimate diet strategy will provide both the pros and the cons, so you can make an informed decision with your health professional.

Find more science-based information on sweeteners at www.SweetSurprise.com.

(1) Kelton Research conducted the phone survey between March 17 and March 23, 2009. Results were collected from a random sample of 516 women ages eighteen and older. Quotas are set to ensure reliable and accurate representation of the total U.S. population.

(2) Fulgoni V. 2008. High-fructose corn syrup: everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask. Am J Clin Nutr 88(6):1715S. White JS. 2008. Straight talk about high-fructose corn syrup: what it is and what it ain’t. Am J Clin Nutr 88(6):1716S-1721S. Melanson KJ, Angelopoulos TJ, Nguyen V, Zukley L, Lowndes J, Rippe JM. 2008. High-fructose corn syrup, energy intake, and appetite regulation. Am J Clin Nutr 88(6):1738S-1744S.

(3) Sacks F. et al. Comparison of Weight-Loss Diets with Different Compositions of Fat, Protein, and Carbohydrates. N Engl J Med 360(9):859-873.