10 Surprising Facts About Using Brain Training to Fight Dementia

  • Author: Health Informer
  • Filed under: Health News
  • Date: Oct 29,2008

It’s National Alzheimer’s Disease Awareness Month

‘Use it or lose it’ is a phrase originally coined to express the benefits of keeping physically fit, but it is equally valid when applied to brain fitness. Numerous studies have shown that regular brain training sessions — aptly referred to as neurobics in some circles — can help stave off dementia and even the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease.

In honor of National Alzheimer’s Disease Awareness Month, brain fitness program developer Dakim, Inc., shares information about how to give your gray matter a good workout, why the right kind of exercise can fortify your mental capacities, and what research says about using brain calisthenics to defend yourself against memory loss.

1 Mental decline is not inevitable. In recent years researchers have found that adults can actually grow new brain cells, reversing a long-held belief that brainpower lost in the aging process cannot be regenerated.

2 You can build a ‘savings account’ of extra neurons — known as a cognitive reserve — that can help offset those you lose as you age. A 2006 data analysis in the Public Library of Science’s PLoS One journal estimated that a mere 5 percent increase in the cognitive reserve has the potential to prevent one third of Alzheimer’s cases worldwide.

3 Frequent cognitive activity can reduce dementia risk up to 63%. That was the conclusion of the Bronx Aging study, which followed a group of 75- to 85-year-olds for many years. Those who participated frequently in activities such as reading, writing, doing crossword puzzles, playing a musical instrument, or playing board games or cards were 63% less likely to develop dementia than those with less lively cognitive calendars.

4 Brain training may slow Alzheimer’s effects. One oft-cited case is that of Richard Wetherill, a retired university lecturer and talented chess player who became concerned when he could see only five chess moves ahead instead of eight. Although neurologic tests were normal, an autopsy when he died soon after revealed advanced Alzheimer’s disease, suggesting that the condition had been kept in check by bolstering his brain with chess and other intellectual ‘push-ups.’

5 A short-term brain workout program is not enough. Many studies indicate that the benefits of cognitive training are lost if it is not done on a regular basis. Consistent, long-term mental stimulation appears to be the key to reducing the risk of memory loss and dementia.

6 If you don’t enjoy it, you will fail. That’s because you won’t stick with anything that’s too boring or too hard. Choose fun activities or brain fitness programs that self-adjust the level of challenge for different ability levels.

7 Cross-training counts. Focusing solely on bridge, sudoku or any other single activity will not exercise all of the cognitive domains considered necessary to keep brains agile. Combining activities that address areas such as short- and long-term memory, critical thinking, visuospatial orientation, calculation and language is a better strategy.

8 Teaching your old brain some new tricks can help. Learn a new language, take saxophone lessons, teach yourself how to use an iPod or iPhone — anything that flexes your mental muscles can contribute to building new brain circuits.

9 Even people with dementia may see improvements. In one case, a woman who had not spoken a word for a year suddenly resumed speaking after completing a Dakim [m]Power Cognitive Fitness System exercise containing piano music. Her first sentence: “I wish I had learned to play piano when I was a little girl.”

10 Physical exercise is brain exercise, too. Cardiovascular and strength training also boost brainpower by generating more blood flow to the brain, supplying oxygen and nutrients, and promoting the growth of new brain cells. In other words, aerobics and neurobics go hand in hand.

Source: Dakim, Inc.


The Truth About Stem Cell Science

U-M experts offer ‘Stem Cells 102′ to present facts to the citizens of Michigan about regulations, oversight and ethical issues surrounding the safety and benefits of stem cell research

University of Michigan experts are providing educational information to help Michigan citizens learn about the ethics, guidelines, and federal and state oversight that apply to all human stem cell research.

“Stem Cells 102,” highlighted in an online video available at www.umich.edu/stemcell, provides accurate answers to those who seek the facts concerning embryonic stem cell research.

Embryonic stem cell research is considered by most scientists to be a very promising avenue for finding new treatments for incurable ailments such as juvenile diabetes and Parkinson’s disease, to better understand inherited human disease, and to develop safer and more effective new drugs.

Embryonic stem cell lines are derived from discarded embryos that were created for fertility treatment, but are surplus or unsuitable for use in fertility treatment. However, Michigan is one of five states that have laws preventing the creation of new embryonic stem cell lines.

Through “Stem Cells 102,” U-M stem cell scientist Sean Morrison, Ph.D., and Michigan Medical School Professor David Gordon, M.D., provide specific information about current issues regarding stem cell research, to clarify the law and the state of regulation.

Morrison directs the Center for Stem Cell Biology at U-M’s Life Sciences Institute and is a faculty member at the U-M Medical School. Gordon directs the Center for Diversity & Career Development, and is a professor and associate dean at the Medical School.

1. Embryonic stem cell research is one of the most regulated areas of medical research.

Embryonic stem cell research is extensively regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) that are created and operated in accordance with federal law, and by Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight Committees that operate pursuant to guidelines from the National Academy of Sciences and the International Society for Stem Cell research.

Federal law (45 C.F.R. part 46) governs human subject research, including any research in which stem cells would be tested on patients as well as any research in which patients would donate embryos for the derivation of stem cell lines. That means that IRBs must approve any stem cell research involving human subjects, including the consent documents used to derive the lines and the methods employed to conduct the research, to ensure that the scientific goals are ethical and beneficial.

2. Additional layers of oversight are present in all federally funded research universities such as the University of Michigan.

Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight Committees (ESCRO committees) were created at research institutions, under guidance from the National Academy of Sciences, to oversee all aspects of pluripotent stem cell research, including all research conducted in laboratory dishes, and all research conducted in patients. This also provides an additional layer of oversight, beyond that provided by IRBs as noted above, over the derivation of stem cell lines. ESCRO committee approval is therefore required for all experiments performed with embryonic stem cells. These oversight committees (IRB and ESCRO) are composed of scientists, physicians, ethicists, lawyers, and members of the community.

3. Private research in companies is also regulated.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates research done at private companies toward the development and testing of any medical product, and imposes similar regulations to ensure that such research is performed ethically. For this reason, companies generally establish their own in-house IRB committees to ensure that their research passes muster with the FDA.

Together, these mechanisms mean regulation of embryonic stem cell research, both at universities and at private companies, is extensive and comprehensive. Note as well that additional laws bearing restrictions on stem cell research are pending before Congress.

4. Current embryonic stem cell lines do not mirror the diversity in our society.

Currently, only certain embryonic stem cell lines, which were created on or before August 9, 2001, can be used for federally funded research. These embryonic stem cell lines do not reflect the diversity in American society. In fact, a surprisingly high fraction of the embryonic stem cell lines approved for use with federal funding arose from embryos obtained from a fertility clinic in Haifa, Israel.

This is key because one of the fundamental principles of clinical trials is that we test new medicines in a diverse patient population that mirrors the diversity in our society. For example, if we test new medicines only on people of a certain ethnic or racial makeup, there would be a risk that the medicines developed would not be as effective in other racial groups. This is because efficacy and side effects sometimes vary between racial or ethnic groups.

Another reason why diversity in clinical research is key is that some inherited diseases are more prevalent in some populations. Examples of such genetic illnesses include Tay-Sachs among Ashkenazi Jews and sickle cell anemia, which is found more often among people of African descent.

It is critical to enroll a diverse patient population so we have an opportunity to detect drugs that work for all ethnic groups. If embryonic stem cell research changes the future of medicine, we may be at risk of leaving certain groups out of that future by not studying embryonic stem cells from all ethnic backgrounds.

5. It is not true that stem cell research is unregulated or that unethical experiments could be conducted on patients.

A recent television ad compared stem cell research to the Tuskegee syphilis experiments, a tragic and universally condemned study conducted decades ago — before current federal laws on research involving humans were put in place. This comparison is utterly baseless and misleading. After the Tuskegee study was exposed to public scrutiny, the federal government put in place new research laws that explicitly prohibit unethical or harmful research. These laws require any stem cell research conducted in patients or in which patients donate embryos for the derivation of stem cell lines to be conducted ethically and safely under the oversight of IRBs or the FDA.

More information on stem cells can be found at www.umich.edu/stemcell and stemcells.nih.gov.

Additional resources:

Stem Cells 101: Five things you should know about stem cell research http://www2.med.umich.edu/prmc/media/newsroom/details.cfm?ID=696

Source: University of Michigan Health System and News and Information Services


Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccines division of sanofi-aventis Group, announced today that an investigational high-dose influenza vaccine demonstrated increased immune responses among adults 65 years of age and older compared with the standard influenza vaccine. The candidate high-dose intramuscular formulation of the influenza vaccine is being developed by sanofi pasteur.

The results were reported today at the 48th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC)/Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 46th annual meeting.

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the currently available inactivated influenza vaccine offers public health benefits in reducing influenza-related morbidity and mortality in older adults. Study authors explain, however, that as people age, the immune system tends to weaken. Older adults become not only more susceptible to infections, but also less responsive to vaccination. When infected with the influenza virus, they are less able to mount an immune response to neutralize the attack. “Development of an influenza vaccine that will provide an improved immune response in older adults is important because this population has the highest rates of complications from influenza including hospitalization and death,” said Ann R. Falsey, MD Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY; Infectious Diseases Unit, Rochester General Hospital. Approximately 90 percent of the 36,000 average annual influenza-associated respiratory and circulatory related deaths occur among adults 65 years of age and older.

Study Results

The Phase III study of almost 4,000 people 65 years of age and older compared the high-dose influenza vaccine with the standard inactivated influenza vaccine formulated for the 2006-2007 season. The key finding is that the new high-dose vaccine increased the immune responses to all three influenza strains compared with standard vaccine in the study population. An important additional observation was that the increased immune response was also observed in the potentially more vulnerable subset of study participants who had no measurable circulating protective antibodies before receiving their annual influenza vaccine.

In the randomized double-blind study conducted at 30 centers throughout the United States, 2,575 people received the high-dose influenza vaccine and 1,262 received the standard influenza vaccine. The standard influenza vaccine contained 15 micrograms of hemagglutinin (HA) of each of three influenza strains, and the high-dose vaccine contained four times as much, 60 micrograms HA per strain. Both vaccines contained two influenza type A strains (H1N1 and H3N2) and one influenza type B strain.

After 28 days, investigators assessed serum hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers in study participants, a standard measurement of the immune response to influenza vaccination. HAI titers are thought by researchers to correlate with increased protection against illness after exposure to influenza. Statistically significant higher HAI titers against all three influenza virus strains were reported in those who received the high-dose vaccine compared with those who received the standard vaccine. Immunogenicity results met pre-defined criteria for overall superiority of the high-dose vaccine. Pre-defined criteria for overall superiority in the phase III study was based on geometric mean titers (GMT) and seroconversion, which is defined as either a rise in HAI titer from < 1:10 to greater than or equal to 1:40 post-vaccination or a greater than or equal to 4-fold increase in HAI titer post-vaccination from a pre-vaccination titer greater than or equal to 1:10.

In a post hoc analysis, study investigators also examined post-vaccination immune responses induced by the two vaccines among a subgroup of study participants with no protective antibodies (HAI titers less than 1:10 as measured by their pre-vaccination serum sample). This subset of the study population represents a group who may be at even higher risk for severe influenza disease and its associated complications. Among all study participants, 10 percent were seronegative for H1N1, 8 percent were seronegative for H3N2, and 21 percent were seronegative for the B strain. Twenty-eight days after vaccination, a higher percentage of the subgroup given the high-dose vaccine developed seroprotective HAI titers of 1:40 or greater to each of the three vaccine strains compared with those given the standard vaccine. In addition, mean HAI titers for all strains were higher in the seronegative individuals who received the high-dose vaccine compared with those who received the standard vaccine.

Source: sanofi pasteur


Rotavirus Infections Decline More than 70 Percent in Children in U.S.

  • Author: Health Informer
  • Filed under: Health News
  • Date: Oct 26,2008

Quest Diagnostics Health Trends(TM) Report shows declines vary widely by state

The largest study of rotavirus laboratory data developed since an oral rotavirus vaccine was introduced in the U.S. in early 2006 shows that cases of rotavirus infection have decreased significantly, suggesting the vaccine is preventing infection in infants and young children. The latest Quest Diagnostics Health Trends(TM) Report also provides evidence for the first time that cases of infection decreased in children up to the age of six, suggesting that herd immunity may have reduced rates of infection in children age two and over who were unlikely to have been vaccinated. However, the report shows that while cases of infection decreased nationally, rates varied by state, indicating possible geographic differences in use of the vaccine.

Rotavirus is the most common cause of severe, dehydrating gastroenteritis among infants and young children worldwide, and one of the leading causes of emergency department visits, physician visits and hospitalizations of children in the United States.

The findings were presented today by Jay M. Lieberman, M.D., medical director, infectious diseases, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated at the Joint Meeting of the 48th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) and the 46th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Disease Society of America (ISDA) in Washington, D.C. The Quest Diagnostics Health Trends(TM) Report is the largest assessment of rotavirus laboratory-test results since the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended routine vaccination in August 2006 for infants at 2, 4, and 6 months of age.

The analysis was performed on de-identified diagnostic test results from September 2003 through June 2008 from data of more than 132,000 patients in the Quest Diagnostics database.

The analysis showed a 76 percent reduction in positive test results during the most recent peak season, December 2007 through June 2008, compared to the three years before the rotavirus vaccine was available, December 2003 to June 2006. In addition, the positivity rate (the number of individuals who test positive in proportion to the total number of tests taken) decreased 70 percent during the study period.

“Our analysis suggests that the oral rotavirus vaccine has been highly effective at reducing the incidence of rotavirus. Our findings reinforce those from a preliminary report issued by the CDC earlier this year. Considering the toll this disease has traditionally taken on children and their families each year in the U.S., this is exciting and welcome news for physicians and parents,” said Dr. Lieberman. “Our report also may have important implications for public health efforts in developing parts of the world, where rotavirus tragically is a frequent cause of childhood death.”

Rotavirus causes severe acute gastroenteritis among infants and young children, often resulting in high fever, vomiting and diarrhea. Rotavirus accounts for more than half a million deaths of children under the age of five each year worldwide. In the U.S., the disease causes fewer deaths annually (an average of 20 to 60), but remains a substantial cause of morbidity, resulting in approximately 410,000 physician visits, 205,000 to 270,000 emergency department visits, and 55,000 to 70,000 hospitalizations. Rotavirus infection represents a significant drain on resources, with estimates of $1 billion in societal costs nationally. In the U.S. rotavirus activity follows a distinct winter-spring seasonal pattern.

Decline in Rotavirus Varies Among States

The analysis showed a reduction in rotavirus positivity rates in all 43 states and Puerto Rico that had submitted at least 100 lab specimens during the pre-vaccine period. Some states experienced greater declines than others, which likely reflect differences in vaccine uptake. The majority of states reduced the incidence of rotavirus, as indicated by positivity rates, by more than 60 percent. However, there was substantial variability, with states such as Delaware, North Carolina, and Alabama each experiencing declines of more than 95 percent, while in Washington, Nebraska, New Mexico, and Arizona, the declines were less than 35 percent.

“While our data does not provide insight into why rates of infection varied geographically, we know that multiple factors determine how quickly new vaccines are adopted by physicians, parents and public health agencies,” said Dr. Lieberman. “We suspect that much of the variability we see in our data is related to such differences in vaccine uptake. Our analysis suggests the need for further research into the factors influencing uptake and its implications for public health policy.”

Herd Immunity Benefits Nonvaccinated Children

The analysis showed that the sharpest decline in positive rotavirus test results, approximately 83 percent, occurred in children younger than 12 months of age, the age group most likely to have been vaccinated. However, the analysis also showed a dramatic decline in positive test results in older children (ranging from 67 to 75 percent), including children ages two to six. Because children older than two years of age in the U.S. are unlikely to have been vaccinated, these data suggest a herd immunity phenomenon, which occurs when enough individuals are vaccinated so as to reduce transmission of a virus, thereby providing some protection to unvaccinated individuals.

“Herd immunity is a significant favorable outcome of a successful vaccination program because it means that even unvaccinated individuals may be benefiting from widespread use of a vaccine,” said Dr. Lieberman. “Our analysis provides evidence for the first time that unvaccinated children may also be reaping the benefits of the rotavirus vaccine. Herd immunity is particularly valuable to newborns and other young infants who have not yet started or completed their vaccine series.”

Study Methodology

The Quest Diagnostics Health Trends(TM) Report, “Decline in Rotavirus Cases in the U.S. After Licensure of a Live, Oral Rotavirus Vaccine,” is based on an analysis of more than 132,000 rotavirus antigen detection test results (by antigen-capture enzyme immunoassay, or EIA) performed from December to June at all Quest Diagnostics regional laboratories, during the period of December 2003 to June 2008. The results were extracted from the Quest Diagnostics Information Data Warehouse (IDW), the largest private database of clinical laboratory tests results in the United States. IDW contains information on all clinical test results reported by Quest Diagnostics laboratories in the United States, and includes data from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. The database includes information on the ordering physician, patient, tests ordered, and results reported, and data are handled in a HIPAA-compliant manner. The study utilized only de-identified testing data that did not contain any patient- or physician-identifiable health information.

In the study, the pre-vaccine period was defined as the three seasons before vaccine* licensure (December through June 2003-2004, 2004-2005, and 2005-2006). The post-vaccine period was defined as the most recent peak season, December 2007 through June 2008. (The December 2006-June 2007 season was a “transition” year, with limited vaccine use in young infants in the months immediately after the vaccine became available.) In the pre-vaccine period, Quest Diagnostics performed an average of 27,625 tests for rotavirus annually, of which 7,162 (26 percent) were positive. By contrast, of the 21,873 tests conducted by Quest Diagnostics in the post-vaccine period, only 1,703 (7.8 percent) were positive – a 76.2 percent reduction in the total number of positive tests (p<0.001). Declines in the number of positive test results during the post-vaccine period were seen in all age groups (ranging from 67.3 percent to 83.2 percent), including children over the age of two. The greatest decline was among children less than 12 months old.

The rate of test positivity decreased from an average of 26 percent during the pre-vaccine period to 7.8 percent in the post-vaccine period, representing a 70.0 percent reduction (p<0.001). Positivity rates declined across age groups (59.0 percent to 76.4 percent), including children over two, with the greatest decline among children less than 12 months old.

* Rotavirus vaccine, live, oral, pentavalent (RotaTeq(R), Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey)

Source: Quest Diagnostics